Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a window in to the systematic procedure

Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as being a window in to the systematic procedure

Recent Remarks

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this coming Saturday, on August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”

Exactly exactly What is becoming clear within the intervening nine years is exactly what a vein that is rich are as tales of what goes on when one thing goes wrong in technology. So that as we’ve done each year at this time, we’ll review just just what occurred within the last few year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is just a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have forfeit a 2019 paper as to how LSD may damage vision because they’d lifted most of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the entire year before in a different sort of log — about methamphetamine.

The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. Based on the article:

Share this:

Authors object as “doubtful” data doom dermatology paper

A dermatology journal has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of scientists in Saudi Arabia after finding a complaint that is“serious about the integrity regarding the information. Nevertheless the very first composer of the paper forced right straight back, saying the move had been unjustified.

This article, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” had been published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgical treatment. It described (with instead grisly photos) the actual situation of the man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.

But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends author that is first of Kumamoto quake paper

The initial writer of a paper that is now-retracted technology in regards to the aftereffects of the lethal 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan is suspended from their university place for starters 12 months.

Intending Lin, associated with Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, ended up being sanctioned because of the organization for misconduct stemming from his abuse of information and plagiarism into the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has led to a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive” attention study; genetics’ high retraction rate

You enjoy our weekly roundup before we present this week’s Weekend Reads, a question: Do? If therefore, we could actually make use of your assistance. Can you think about a donation that is tax-deductible help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: could you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever wished to hone your talent as a medical sleuth? Now’s your possibility.

As a result of the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), which will be focused on educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Take a good look at the image below, and then simply simply just take our poll. From then on, go through the website link below to learn the answer that is right.

Share this:

Cock and bull story results in retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients had thing for hybrids (think pets, perhaps not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with individual torsos, winged horses and lions, you can get the image. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.

A team of researchers in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for wanting to reuse information from a chicken research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never impact virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information earn fluorosis paper a banner

A present article that provided a stark caution in regards to the risks to young ones of fluoride into the nation’s water was tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of a fresh paper which undermines the dependability associated with initial information.

This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a dental journal. The very first writer on the paper is Christopher Neurath, associated with United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

The article, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2011 and 2012, reported increases that are“large severity and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to into the mid-1980s.

Based on the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just just How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a journal that is peer-reviewed?

Often, a paper occurs that is therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore as opposed to you will need to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern after an audience notified the log about possible difficulties with the info.

The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of a putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press title, on June 19 for this 12 months. In line with the writers — a team that is international includes scientists during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *